GRREaD

Group Reading & Rereading Easy Appropriate texts Daily

Revisiting the Familiar

Background:      The instructional strategy of Repeated Reading Grread is underpinned by the belief that comprehension can be enhanced when an individual reads the same text time and time again as Clay (1991, p.16) elaborates in the following way.

“Being allowed to read familiar books is rare in schools.  Adults seem only interested in children reading unseen text.  Because several readings increase familiarity,teachers are wary of

‘memorising’.  Reading however, is not about memorising words.It is what the child brings to the book they read last week or last week –an awareness of plot and character, of meanings

and of language  structures and words – that provides the half-recalled context for the re-reading. The reading task is still new and challenging because the child is bringing that prior

knowledge to the text, and this time the child may notice things hat he failed to attend to on previous reading.  When children are allowed to re-read familiar material they are being allowed

to learn to be readers, to read in ways which draw on all their language  resources and knowledge of the world, to put this very complex recall and sequencing behaviour into a fluent

rendering of the text  … Now the support is coming from his own prior reading.  That familiarity is supporting his move towards further independence as a reader.”    Clay, M.M. (1991) Becoming literate.  The construction of inner control.   Heinemann.

When a reader revisits the familiar, their comprehension skills are enhanced. They can make more text-to-text and text-to-self connections.  They develop a heightened awareness of the syntactic structures,  the vocabulary,  the high frequency words, the orthographic and phonological elements of the text which all contribute to fluent reading. In agreement with the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000a) p. 11, “fluency is one of several critical factors necessary for reading comprehension “but” is often neglected in the classroom”. [1]

[1] National Institute of Child Heath and Human Development (200b) Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching
Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Reports of the Subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.

Grread (1 teacher & 4-5 children) : is a 5 week, 20 minute per day reading strategy that provides ‘like’ groups of readers (same instructional level), the opportunity to read massive amounts of appropriate texts aloud daily.  It is a strategy for all readers and particularly for:

* Readers who do not read in a phrased, fluent or expressive way

* Readers experiencing difficulties with comprehension

* Students who do not have opportunities to read outside school hours

* Students who have been at school for 6 months or more and are finding Level 1 texts hard

* English as additional language (EAL) learners

 Grread is supplementary to classroom reading sessions and is additional to Shared Reading, Interactive Reading and Guided Reading.

 


15 thoughts on “GRREaD

  1. Fantastic Trish. Very easy to understand, makes perfect sense. I think teachers and students would love it as you would definitely see an increase in reading confidence.

  2. Wow, what fantastic results we had using the GREEaD program in our junior school last year. This program is well worth implementing. Thanks heaps Trish.

  3. Hi Trish,
    I can remember you talking about this years ago and we tried something similar in Wyndham. Would love to try it at my current school! Do you have any more info/word documents about GRREAD you could email? jcaley@gegs.wa.edu.au

    Thanks!

  4. Hi Trish
    was told about this program from our Reading Recovery teacher just recently and think it would be a great idea for our current students. Am hoping to follow up with my team and see how we can best utilize this wonderful opportunity to engage students in familiar text more often.
    Would love to know more . Thanks!

  5. Love the blog Trish!
    GRRREaD looks good.
    Wondering if there is any data as to impact?
    How do I check with Karen re her results?
    Any other info, word docs..

    • Hi Marie, Original research does have data to support efficacy but still need to dig that out of archives.
      One of the main reasons GRRREaD came about was because, in my travels around schools, I saw instances of
      kids spending so much time on mind-numbing activities eg., cutting out letters from magazines to construct words etc., that I wanted to get books into their hands. I wondered whether it was ‘lack of opportunity’ and confusion about reading process that could have been stymieing children in becoming literate. Also, for older children – (of course with appropriate texts!) – surely couldn’t do any harm? (Links to Stanovich and ‘Matthew effect’)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *